29 Sept 2016
28 Sept 2016
27 Sept 2016
26 Sept 2016
23 Sept 2016
American soldiers during Afghan National Army training at Camp Bastion in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, in March. This year’s presidential campaign has hardly touched the war in Afghanistan.
The United States will soon mark 15 full years of war in Afghanistan, but you wouldn’t know it from the political discourse.
Democrats and Republicans seem to have something of a rare, if unspoken, truce on the subject. Even amid deepening partisan polarization, with the most frivolous issues seized for political gain, no one seems eager to discuss a war that is still costing American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
This year’s presidential campaign, in which mass deportations and the NATO alliance are on the table, has hardly touched it. When Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump squared off at a recenton national security issues, they were surrounded by an audience of veterans, many of whom had fought in Afghanistan, but the war And though the election has grown most heated over terrorism and immigration, the candidates showed rare restraint on Monday, when the police arrested an Afghan-born American citizen, Ahmad Khan Rahami, on suspicion of planting bombs in Manhattan and New Jersey.
Mr. Trump’s response was typically harsh and Mrs. Clinton’s typically detailed, but neither had much to say about Afghanistan. That is a conspicuous and newfound prudence for both candidates, who have been eager to discuss Syria and Iraq immediately after terrorist attacks linked to those countries.
Whether or not investigators find connections between these bombings and American action in Afghanistan, it is increasingly apparent that America’s public and policy makers alike would rather not address their faraway, largely failed war.
Neither party has an incentive to call attention to this bipartisan failure. Neither has a better policy to offer. And neither sees any political gain in raising it. Voters, entering their fourth consecutive presidential election with the United States at war, seem happy to pretend that the Afghan war, which has killed more than 2,300 American service members, doesn’t exist.
18 Sept 2016
30 Aug 2016
27 Aug 2016
Honda Civic 2016 vs. 2016 Toyota Corolla: Which is Better ?
![]() |
| If you're interested in a reliable, roomy, affordable compact car, we have no doubt that the 2016 Honda Civic and 2016 Toyota Corolla both appear on your shopping list. And indeed, both sedans tout roomy interiors, excellent gas mileage, reasonable pricing and notorious durability. But which one is better? And which one should you get? To help you figure it out, we've created a close comparison between the 2016 Civic and the 2016 Corolla, but first let's see what's new with both models for the latest model year. |
![]() |
Fuel Economy
The Civic is currently offered with two engine choices, with more to undoubtedly follow. Base-level models use a 158-horsepower 2.0-liter 4-cylinder, which is offered with a 6-speed manual or a continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT). Fuel economy reaches 27 miles per gallon in the city and 40 mpg on the highway with the manual or an impressive 31 mpg city/41 mpg hwy with the automatic. Upper-level Civic models (the EX-T, EX-L and Touring) include a 174-hp 1.5-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder. This engine, which is only offered with a CVT, returns an excellent 31 mpg city/42 mpg hwy.
Meanwhile, the Corolla only offers a 1.8-liter engine. Most models get it with 132 hp, while it boasts 140 horses in the LE Eco. Available in 4-speed automatic, CVT automatic or 6-speed manual guise, the Corolla touts up to 27 mpg city/36 mpg hwy with the 4-speed, 28 mpg city/37 mpg hwy with the 6-speed manual and up to 30 mpg city/42 mpg hwy with the LE Eco trim level and the CVT.
|
![]() |
2016 Toyota Corolla
The Corolla was fully redesigned a few years ago and is unchanged for 2016, save for a slightly updated Entune infotainment system and a new Special Edition trim variant.
|
20 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016
لبيك اللهم لبيك
![]() |
لبيك اللهم لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك اللهم لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك لبيك
لبيك اللهم لبيك
![]() |
لبيك اللهم لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك اللهم لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك لبيك
لبيك لا شريك لك لبيك
إن الحمد والنعمة
لك والملك، لا شريك لك لبيك
لبيك لبيك
17 Aug 2016
Awesome Romantic Photos
"I love you without knowing how, or when, or from where. I love you simply, without problems or pride: I love you in this way because I do not know any other way of loving but this, in which there is no I or you, so intimate that your hand upon my chest is my hand, so intimate that when I fall asleep your eyes close."




























